Monday, 3 April 2017

Letter to the I: 3 Day Weekend Letter

While I admire the idealism and the compassion behind the Green Party's idea for a 3 day weekend, I do think this idea is somewhat unhelpful.  It is particularly unhelpful for workers in the emergency services who do not always enjoy the luxury of a weekend.  It is also especially unhelpful for those of us, myself included, who get paid on a per hour basis.  This coming bank holiday of two enforced days off will put a noticeable hole in my pay packet.
     If the Greens are genuinely worried about exploitation then perhaps they need to focus more on spreading awareness of workers statutory rights, particularly those workers who are not on permanent contracts.  Many of them are vulnerable to having their hours changed without consultation and face bullying and harassment from managers.

Regards


Zachary Barker

Saturday, 1 April 2017

Letter to the I: Reply to Brexit Letter

Robert Readman's daily letter,  31st March edition, completely misses the point.  While Mr Readman chiefly blames the EU so-called "Eurocrats " for us leaving I believe the main blame lies with us.   We had 40 years to try and set out an alternative vision for the EU.  Instead of being constructive we used those 40 years just to endlessly grumble, complain and display unyielding pessimism about the course of the organisation.
     Claims like Readman's hide the real reasons why we are pursuing our current course.  The truth is that we are having an identity crisis, the consequences of which will hit our economy like a train crash, not to mention our public services in which EU migrants work.  Those who voted for Brexit because they regret how they voted in the 1970s should frankly get over it.

Regards


Zac Barker

Wednesday, 29 March 2017

Letter to the I: Brexit Letter

Hugh Bennett's article in favour of Brexit is an impressive example of rewriting history to suit one's, otherwise unjustifiable, argument.  Pro Brexit commentators wax lyrical about how much the Euro has apparently punished the economies of southern EU member states, but have completely ignored the structural weaknesses in these economies that have long been present in them.  Greece for one has a toxic culture of tax evasion throughout its elite that has nothing to do with the EU.
     Bennett's hint that the real forces of internationalism are behind Brexit fly in the face of reality.  Throughout Europe Brexit is not supported by dynamic internationalists but by preachers of the old nationalism that have worked hard to set our continent back decades.  I trust Bennett will not let the truth get in the way  of a good yarn on my account in the future.

Regards


Zac Barker

Tuesday, 28 March 2017

Letter to the I Newspaper: The Death of Martin McGuinness

The death of Martin McGuinness in the same week as the Westminster Attacks forces us to face some inconvenient truths about terrorism.  As strong willed as PM Theresa May seemed after the Westminster Attacks the truth is that she was completely wrong in saying that there are no "types" of terrorism.
     The truth is the motives and the causes of terrorists matter.  Some can indeed and should be addressed through political means such as diplomacy and peace processes.  Martin McGuinness did not just spontaneously decide to start blowing things up.  His experiences convinced him that he was at war with the British state since it seemed to support a society that kept his people living like second class citizens.
      The trouble is that while Sinn Fein see the merit of working with democratic pluralism, Islamists by design seems hell bent on destroying it.  If individuals in this country support an ideology such as that, then they should have the right to campaign and stand on a party platform for it.  Just as I should have the right to campaign vigorously against them.


Regards

Zac Barker

Sunday, 26 March 2017

Letter to the I: The Labour Party

The I's interview with the Labour Party Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell was very revealing into how deluded him and his leader really are.  He points to the 2008 economic crash as the main point at which Labour lost economic credibility.  Very tellingly he mentions nothing about how Gordon Brown as Chancellor escalated spending to the point where extra borrowing topped it up.  It is obvious that he didn't mention this because this is exactly what his economic plans entail; spending and borrowing without limits.
     The Tories exaggerated the extent to which Labour overspent to justify their fanatical quest to shrink the state at all costs. But this does not mean that Labour must revert to stereotypical socialism.  It is clear that Corbyn and his allies are more interested in discrediting the New Labour legacy than he is in gaining power.  The problem is that he and his allies mistakenly see New Labour and the Tories' vision as being synonymous.


Regards

Zac Barker

Letter to the I: The Russian Threat

I read with great interest in this paper in the 13th March issue about how GCHQ will be holding seminars to educate politicians about the threat from Russian hackers.  I find it staggering how complacent the political class in and out of government, and the general public, are about the Russian threat.  Theresa May in her previous cabinet role moved to postpone the inquest into Alexander Litvinenko's assassination, so as not to upset our relations with the Russians.  Jeremy Corbyn has disgracefully belittled NATO, despite the fact that it was a Labour Foreign Secretary, Ernest Bevin, who helped found the alliance.
     This country is sleepwalking into appeasement towards an aggressive Russia.  But by pursuing this course we are clearly displaying our sense of weakness in a changing world, and Russia's president proves that he exploits weakness.  Theresa May needs to focus less on the UK being a trading nation and more about us being a nation that stands up to international bullies.

Regards


Zac Barker

Monday, 20 February 2017

My Model United Nations Story...........so far

"The purpose of our lives is to be happy".

Dalai Lama

When we are younger, there is undoubtedly  pressure to conform,  to behave a certain way,  to hang out with the right people.  But as we get older, or at least as I do, those pressures seem to become less and less.  It is not that those pressures are no longer there, it is that I simply do not feel a need to live up to them.  My current involvement with Model United Nations is a case in point.  Here I am, going to regular Tuesday night meetings with a bunch of students, a few years after I have graduated.  And then on some weekends I trot off to some city to pretend to be a country at a conference  for a weekend and if I am lucky I get an award for it.  The path I have chosen is an unusual one.  But it is one I cherish.

My first year of involvement with Model United Nations did not start off on an especially exciting note.  For one it was clear that the current President at the Bristol club clearly did not like me.  I happily reciprocated this attitude by choosing to play the small island nation of Tuvalu every week.  We could of been discussing the Syrian Civil War and I would choose to be Tuvalu just to annoy her.  MUN conferences were very weakly advertised so I went to my first one at UCL.  To be honest I wasn't overly impressed.  I was Togo on the UN Security Council and we discussed drug trafficking.  Togo is too small and poor to have much of a drugs problem.

I was starting to wonder what the big deal was about MUN conferences when I went to the Bath MUN conference of 2014.  I was Egypt on the Disarmament Committee where the main topic that was being discussed was nuclear disarmament.  Egypt didn't have much to say on the matter.  Egypt's nuclear ambitions pretty much died when Israeli intelligence assassinated all of it's missile scientists many years ago.  Early on, the debate seemed to sway towards the established nuclear powers who talked down the rest of us, literally (they were on the higher seats in the lecture theatre) and in terms of tone.  They dictated what they wanted, pretty much their continued dominance of nuclear matters and then went out of the room for a smugly congratulatory smoke break.  In the last hour a delegate arrived who helped kindle my love affair with Model United Nations.  He had a cheeky grin and he was here as Pakistan.  He asked me if I wanted to wipe the smile off the faces of the nuclear powers.  I nodded in approval and watched with wonder as he darted around the room with some furious lobbying.  In no time at all he came back an sat next to me rubbing his hands with glee.   When it came to voting time I could see why he was so happy.  One clause after the other we shredded the resolution that was dictated to us by the nuclear powers.  The developing world cheered at it's successful rebellion.
At the end of my Masters degree I watched the changing of the guard as the despised President of our Model United Nations Society left.  As I turned to leave the door the new President, Mark, asked me what I would do upon my graduation and whether I would still attend the club sessions.  I expressed doubt, after all I was no longer a student and now a mere civilian.  Mark replied that I should consider coming back to MUN and if I did I would be most welcome.   Something touched me about what he said.  I thought back to the strange little debates on a Tuesday evening in a cold room of the University of Bristol's Students Union and of course of that eye opening encounter with the delegate of Pakistan.  I wanted to stay, and so I did.

My civilian career in Model United Nations is when it really took off for me.  One of my first conferences after graduation was Reading MUN.  On this I was Russia on the Security Council and we were discussing Syria.  Needless to say things got heated very quickly.  I wielded my veto like a serial killer wields a bloody machete in a horror film.  I met Western horror with standard Russian Government lack of concern and disdain.  I even got to make a guy's life hell who was deliberately rude to me before sessions began.  All in all I was having a lot of fun.  It was also a fulfilling conference on a personal level since I met a good friend of mine who will now be a Stag Do attendee and friends from Israel and Palestine on the same committee.  The formula appeared to be set; dead end job during the week and vulgar displays of power at the weekend.

My time with MUN became a big confidence booster when I started to win awards at conferences.  The first time I did was during one of my most emotional MUN battles.  This was at the Bath conference a few years ago when I was New Zealand on the Historical Security Council where we were discussing the 1994 Rwandan Genocide and the Bosnian War.  I felt determined to make this performance a spirited one so I invested in purchasing the book "Shake Hands with the Devil" by Romeo Dallaire, the former UN Force Commander of the UN mission.  While this book was incredibly helpful for debate research it was extremely harrowing.  Dallaire, who had a nervous breakdown after the mission, threw all of his tortured guilt and anger at the UN hierarchy into the pages he wrote.  It was impossible to not get emotionally invested.  So I was pretty hyped up when it came to the actual debate, since New Zealand was one of the few countries who at the time who wanted to intervene to stop the killing.  The next debate was interesting too with a sinister visiting speaker from the Republic of Srpska claiming to have not ethnically cleansed any of their Muslim citizens, who seemed to have vanished.  "You can't make us prosecute our generals and politicians!" they cried.  "What kind of country does that?" she wailed.  "Germany", I responded.

The debates can get especially emotionally exhausting if you are playing a country whose views you are completely opposed to your own.  I remember the eyes boring into me with discomfort and alarm when as the Pakistani representative (always a troublemaker it seems) I announced to the Human Rights Council at Belfast MUN that all gay people are basically born criminals.  At a recent debate I felt pretty dirty inside articulating Russia's views in the South Sudanese War.  This basically cast me as a merchant of death with a veto preventing an arms embargo at all cost.  My political brief prevented me from admitting that I was arming pretty much everyone in the region including the parties to the conflict and would probably ignore any arms embargoes if any were set up anyway.  At the same time a very confident and determined British delegate called me on pretty much all of the bloody lies I was spreading.  I had maximum respect for him and yet my position made me root for the bad guy in this Blofeld versus Bond scenario.  This was also the first time after years of trying that I won a Best Delegate award at UCL MUN, which meant a lot.

But winning isn't everything and it usually takes losing to remind people of that.  My winning streak this year came to an abrupt pause at South West MUN.  I admit my ego was riding high at this point.  I had expected to walk away with something, but stiff competition prevented me from doing so.  Despite walking away empty handed awards wise I had a fun weekend and yet again met some lovely people.

Not winning at South West MUN made me reflect on my unusual situation philosophically.  Here I am, a graduate, some years older than my colleagues due to my large study gap between my respective degrees.  I tend to use MUN conference weekends as an escape from whatever humdrum job I tend to have.  I reflected on whether I should act my age, but then I remember a piece of advice my soon -to-be wife gave to me; "life is too short for you not to do things you enjoy".  I also wondered about how I used to attend clubs during my undergraduate degree in which , no matter how hard I tried, I never felt accepted.  I never felt that way at MUN, there this strange wanderer has always been welcomed.  And my rude interruption in my winning streak taught me something else, despite my MUN experience I still have much to learn.  But I am fine with that.  My philosophical musings also revealed something interesting and slightly disturbing; that I tend to win awards when representing illiberal countries.  Does that mean if I represent the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) I can go the distance?  Well there is only one way to find out I suppose.


And so I carry on with my rock and roll time with Model United Nations.  My weekends going to conferences have a certain rhythm.  I come to some interesting (usually) city or town, find vital utilities like a Wetherspoons or late night take-away outlets and then go in search of my lodgings.  Belfast is probably the most interesting city I went to with interesting tours of former paramilitary occupied areas, and yes a Wetherspoons.  My lodgings tend to vary from hostels of varying quality to Airbnb rooms with similar hazards, although at the last one I was spoiled rotten by my hosts.  I usually walk into conference each morning listening to my music to make me determined, or angry up my blood if I am playing a particularly hard-line or brutal country.  Then there are the debates which are such a hive of activity that ours go by feeling like minutes.  But the traditional farewell at the end of MUN conferences is one thing that I find the most touching.  Traditionally delegates write messages of congratulations or good wishes on their colleagues' country placards. That way in the future one can look back on these messages and smile.  I have kept most of my placards and yes they do still keep me smiling.