I applaud Paul Cross's creative thinking with regards to
giving US citizens 18th century medical care for gunshot wounds to go with
their similarly aged gun rights. However
I would point out to him the hazard of wounded innocent bystanders not getting
the healthcare they deserve under this plan.
Instead I propose that the only firearms legal under the US
Constitution's Second Amendment should be 18th century firearms. It would be hard to carry out mass shootings
or gangland drive-bys with muskets. But
if they were good enough to keep away the British Redcoats, surely they are
good enough for self defense?
Regards
Zachary Barker
No comments:
Post a Comment