Mary Hopkins' letter completely missed the point with
regards to Prince Harry's apparent advocacy of the cause of treating mental
illnesses. She takes it for granted that
the Royal's relationships with charities are one way supportive
relationships. It is not since Royals
need the charities more than the charities need them. Royal support often does not go beyond a
visit to the charities, which imposes a cost on them, and brief supportive
mentions and photo opportunities. Would
it be too much to ask for Royals instead of collecting charities, to actually
sustain support in terms of time and
money into one of them? Would it
also be asking too much for Prince Harry to consider what credibility he has in
talking about strained public services, while he lives a taxpayer funded lavish
lifestyle?
Regards
Zachary Barker
Bristol
No comments:
Post a Comment